We are living at
a time when there are questionable ethics in every aspect of our society. The Bible has much to say about ethical
conduct for those who consider themselves a follower of the laws of God. The terms ethics and morals are virtual
synonyms. Ethics is what is normative
and absolute. It refers to a set of
standards around which we organize our lives, and from which we define our
duties and obligations. Morality or
mores is the shifting behavioral patterns of society or culture.
The LORD was
developing a nation that was based on the ethical holiness of GOD. The moral laws in the 19th chapter were not
just commands of conformity. They called
for just, humane, and sensitive treatment of others. The elderly, the
handicapped, the poor all were to receive consideration and courtesy. The laborer was to be paid promptly. The stranger was to be shown the same love
given to fellow citizens. The ethical
treatment of people was not with overt behavior but with motive; vengefulness
and bearing a grudge was condemned. How
our society has changed from how the LORD intended for us to act.
Regarding the
aged or elderly. I can remember when the elderly was respected. People would hold doors for them, offer them
a seat, allow them to first in line; they were respected. The elderly was thought of as wise and
insightful. Here in the 19th chapter, we
are given this command: Show honor to old people, stand up when they enter the
room. We are to stand upon in the
presence of the aged, show them respect and doing this you show reverence to
God. Manners are not taught to children
today. When an elderly person is
speaking to you, stand up. Don't walk in
front of two elderly people talking.
Don't interrupt elderly people who are in conversation.
There was a time
when people looked up to those who had been around the block a couple of time
or more. They had a certain knowledge
and skills that society thought as useful.
I remember holding my teachers in high regard and having respect for
most of them. Sure, there were those you
couldn't stand, but for the most part, you treated them with respect. You would not even consider cussing out a
teacher or calling them a name to their face or threaten them with violence. When did we lose our respect for the elderly? I am not trying to make this a generational
issue but is does seem that every generation has less respect for the
elderly. I am aware there are some who
have been taught to respect their elders, I am speaking about the one who
doesn't. What happened in their life
that made them so disrespectful?
Our traditions
are part of who we are, and many seem unimportant to the culture today, but
they are the connection to the past.
Some of our traditions are like Grandma's quilt. It is thread bare, hard to clean, and not
very warm in the winter. A newer quilt
would be much better, warmer, easy to clean and even fits the bed. We don't throw out Grandma's quilt because we
want to hold on to the past. The same
with customs of honoring the elderly they are our connect to the past and
should be honored.
At the beginning
of our country, there was no place for the handicap. They were treated differently. It was until some people set out to change
the way the handicap has been addressed that legislation was enacted in 1973 to
change how there were treated. In 1975,
Education for All Handicap Children Act provided education free for any child
living with a disability. In 1990, the
American With Disabilities Act protected from discrimination from
employers. Do these laws work to give a
better life?
People with
disabilities are four to ten times more likely to be a victimized than people
without disabilities. Most crimes
against the disabled are not reported.
Caregivers often do not believe them when they do report abuse. Most programs for crime victims are not
available to much disabled because of accessibility. The FBI and the National
Crime Victimization Survey administered by the Depart of Justice does not
include people with disabilities.
Do we need laws
to tell us how to treat people; apparently, since children are not taught at
home?
In the past few
years, there has been an increase in the number of poor in our country. When President Johnson declared war on
Poverty it was a no-win situation the War on Poverty has cost $22 trillion --
three times more than what the government has spent on all wars in American
history. Federal and state governments spend $1 trillion in taxpayer dollars on
America's 80 means-tested welfare programs annually.
Even though the war
on poverty has been a failure, the poor in this country are far better off than
other countries.
Eighty percent
of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, at the beginning of the
War on Poverty, only about 12 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed the
air conditioning.
Nearly
three-quarters have a car or truck; 31 percent have two or more cars or trucks.
Nearly
two-thirds have cable or satellite television.
Two-thirds have
at least one DVD player, and a quarter has two or more.
Half have a
personal computer; one in seven has two or more computers.
More than half
of poor families with children have a video game system such as an Xbox or
PlayStation.
Forty-three
percent have Internet access.
Forty percent
have a wide-screen plasma or LCD TV.
A quarter have a
digital video recorder system such as a TIVO.
Ninety-two
percent of poor households have a microwave. TV newscasts about poverty in
America depict the poor as homeless or as residing in dilapidated living
conditions. While some families do experience such severe conditions, they are
far from typical of the population defined as poor by the Census Bureau. The
actual housing conditions of poor families are very different.
Over the course
of a year, only 4 percent of poor persons become temporarily homeless. At a
single point in time, one in 70 poor persons is homeless.
Only 9.5 percent
of the poor live in mobile homes or trailers; 49.5 percent live in separate
single-family houses or townhouses, and 40 percent live in apartments.
Forty-two
percent of all poor households own their own homes. The average home owned by
persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with
one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.
Only 7 percent
of poor households are overcrowded. More than two-thirds have more than two
rooms per person.
The average poor
American has more living space than the average individual living in Sweden,
France, Germany, or the United Kingdom. (These comparisons are to the average
citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor.) Could it be that our changing definition of
poor has contributed to the problem?
1.2 billion
people live off $1.25 a day. Poor people
in developing countries spend 60-80% of their income on food. 3 million children die from malnutrition
every year.
Imagine if every
child between the ages of 0 and 4 in the states of Maryland, New Jersey,
Virginia, New York, Connecticut, Delaware, and D.C. died in 2017. It would be
utter chaos.
Maybe the
government needs to teach family responsibility, support the family unit
instead of breaking it up. Nearly
two-thirds of those classed as living in poverty are single parent
families. It is easier to get government
assistance when you are a single parent.
Jesus said that we would always have the poor with us. Does that mean we ignore them and treat them
with disrespect? No. We need to help
free them from the bondage of poverty.
I am about to
wander into an area that has already caused me to offend some people. I have been told I lacked love and was a poor
example of a Christian. That may be true
but what I believe is not based on my belief system but the word of God.
So, let us
tackle the subject of how do we treat the stranger. Countless Bible studies have been conducted
in America using the passages of scripture about the "stranger" and
the "aliens" in our country.
The 19th chapter of Leviticus is the foundation for some of this
discussion.
Let us read from
the Bible Lev. 19:33-34. Christians were
supporting the "stranger and illegal alien" stop right there and
decide they know all they need to know about their duty as Christians towards
the illegal alien. We are to treat them
like one born among us, according to the Bible.
That means the benefits of citizenship.
But wait, they
have developed some terrible theology- not to mention politics. Liberals have taken a scripture out of
context, by not understanding what is being said to whom about whom. The question is how do we deal with the
"stranger or foreigners"?
Before we start quoting scripture, we need to define the eight words
which are translations of the word stranger, strangers, foreigner, sojourners
or alien and how they are used. Without
this clarification, we have scriptures that appear contradictory and
inconsistent.
These laws were
given to make a distinction between the Hebrew people and the non-Hebrew. The strangers were not permitted to worship
with the Hebrews. They were not to come
near the Tabernacle if they did they were to be put to death. They could not participate in the Jewish
Passover. They were to stay separated
from Hebrew people.
The command is
to treat the stranger well because they knew what it was like to be a
stranger. Here is a significant
difference between the Hebrews and those coming illegally into our country. In the beginning, the Hebrew was the guest of
the Egyptian Pharaoh. Later they would
be oppressed by a ruler "who did not know Joseph." They were not trespassers or lawbreakers;
they were not there in Egypt illegally.
In fact, in Genesis 46:28-34, they were not to offend their host in any
way. God loves the stranger and so
should we. They are to be treated with
respect and dignity. They should not be
mistreated. They should be given food
and clothing as they need. That is the
message of the Bible- treat the law-abiding foreigner and aliens with love and
compassion.
Those who came
into the land of the Hebrews were expected to obey Hebrew law. They were treated differently than the Hebrew
citizen. They could not own property;
they could be bought and sold as slaves, strangers were charged interest on
loans, strangers would be put to death if they violated the law of
worship.
So, if we are to
follow the teachings of the Bible, those who come into this country come by
invitation only. Foreigners can never
own property, they will be put to death if they disrupt our worship, are not to
offend the citizens of this country, and they cannot celebrate our religious
holidays.
We have an
ethical obligation to follow the command of God regarding our fellow man. We can always expect those who have no regard
for the law to disagree with us. I find
it difficult to understand why someone would take away from their family and
give to someone who disrespects them. I
find it even harder to understand how someone can willingly give away the
future of their children to criminals?
We have all witnessed on the news the stories of those in our country
illegally who have taken the life of someone's son our daughter. How is this justified?
As Christians,
we do have an ethical and moral obligation to treat people with respect, but we
are not obligated to assist those who are lawbreakers. Let me again say, The moral laws in the 19th
chapter were not just commands of conformity.
They called for just, humane, and sensitive treatment of others. The
elderly, the handicapped, the poor all were to receive consideration and
courtesy. The laborer was to be paid
promptly. The stranger was to be shown
the same love given to fellow citizens.
The ethical treatment of people was not with overt behavior but with
motive; vengefulness and bearing a grudge was condemned. How our society has changed from how the LORD
intended for us to act.
When Jesus
stated the next great commandment was to "Love your neighbor as yourself,
He was saying an Old Testament command found in verse 18 of chapter 19. This scripture is what has been called the
"golden rule." There are both
negative and positive forms of this "rule," but all of them demand
that we treat others with the same kind of treatment we want for ourselves.
At the beginning
of chapter 19 of Leviticus God gave this command, "Be holy because I, the
Lord your God, am holy." There is
no doubt a great distance between the holiness of God and the holiness of man, yet,
God urges us to close that distance by keeping the commandments of God. Jesus said, If ye love me you will keep my
commandments." The Law of Holiness
is not addressed to a selected group of individuals. It is applied to the entire community of Believers. The Law aims to create a holy people who live
their lives in a display of consecration to God in their day-to-day relations
in all their affairs of life.
In chapter 18
verse 21 it states, "Do not give any of your children to be sacrificed to
Molek, for you must not profane the name of your God. I am the Lord." In
chapter 19 verse 12 the same expression is used, "‘Do not swear falsely by
my name and so profane the name of your God. I am the Lord." To profane, the name of the LORD is to impair
His reputation among the non-believers.
When Christians
agree with, tolerate, or condone actions that the LORD has said are a violation
of His commandments they profane the name of the LORD. During the time, these commands were given
people would sacrifice their children to the god Molek. Sacrificing to Molek is
no different than those who sacrifice their children to the abortionist.
Christians who agree with, tolerate or condone abortion profane the name of the
LORD. Murdering an innocent child is to
profane the name of the LORD. How can
the LORD bless a nation that both believers and non-believers support the
killing of innocent children?
In the book of
Ezekiel, when the people of Judah brought punishment upon themselves, they
profaned the name of the LORD. The
Gentiles regarded the defeat of Judah as a defeat of Judah's God. The reason the people of Judah were in exile
was their God was not powerful enough to protect them. So, the reputation of God was profaned.
How the LORD is
viewed by the non-believer is not His worry, it is the responsibility of those
who call themselves Christian.
Christians must live and act as to win respect for Jesus Christ among
those who are non-believers. Any
behavior that brings public disgrace on Christians is taking the name of Jesus
Christ in vain. As a representative or
witness of the LORD, any action that enhances the dignity and honor of
Christianity is the sanctification of the Name of the LORD.
In conclusion,
morality or mores is the shifting behavioral patterns of society or
culture. We have been given a warning
about living a "moral" life. The morality of the end times is given
to us in Paul's second letter to Timothy, "But know this, that in the last
days perilous times will come: For men
will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers,
disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers,
without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty,
lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but
denying its power. And from such people turn away." These are the behaviors that exemplify our
society.
As a Christian,
we are to live holy lives based on God's ethics. Ethics is what is normative
and absolute. It is the standards around
which we organize our lives, and from which we define our duties and
obligations. The command to be a holy
people is based on ethical living. The
ethical standard was given to us by the LORD for the normal life of the
Christian. The commands are absolute and
not based on the cultural morality. The
LORD says today, ‘You shall be holy, for I the Lord your God am holy."
No comments:
Post a Comment